This is a real, unedited run of Meeting Notes Agent — no mockups, no cherry-picking. It's the store's whole promise: see the tool do the job before you pay for it.
Run onNotes from today's call: John said pricing needs to go up, maybe 10%. Sarah worried about churn if we do that. Need to decide by Friday. Someone needs to email the design team about the new mockups. Q3 roadmap still not finalized, revisit next week. Action items unclear, follow up needed.
demo · Meeting Notes Agent · 2026-08-29
Incoming transcript: "Notes from today's call: John said pricing needs to go up, maybe 10%. Sarah worried about churn if we do that. Need to decide by Friday. Someone needs to email the design team about the new mockups. Q3 roadmap still not finalized, revisit next week. Action items unclear, follow up needed."
Meeting Notes Agent — processed output:
Decisions Made: — None finalized this call. One decision is pending with a hard deadline (see below).
Open Decisions (require resolution): 1. Pricing increase of ~10% Context: John advocates raising price; Sarah flagged churn risk as the counterargument. Decision needed by: Friday Owner of decision: UNASSIGNED — flagging this. No one was named as the decision-maker. Recommend John and Sarah co-own, since both stakes are represented. Blocker to resolve: churn impact is asserted but not quantified. See action item 2.
Action Items: 1. Email the design team about the new mockups. Owner: UNASSIGNED — transcript says "someone." Needs a name before this call ends or it will slip. Due: not stated. Suggested: within 2 business days. 2. Quantify churn risk of a 10% price increase (to inform Friday's decision). Owner: Sarah (implied — she raised the concern) Due: before Friday's decision meeting Note: I inferred this. It wasn't stated as an action item, but the Friday decision can't be made responsibly without it. Confirm or drop it. 3. Revisit and finalize Q3 roadmap. Owner: UNASSIGNED Due: next week (specific day not given — recommend setting one)
Follow-ups / Loose Threads: — "Action items unclear, follow up needed" — this is a flag, not a task. Resolving it means assigning owners to items 1 and 3 above.
What I couldn't do from this transcript — plainly: Three of your items have no named owner because the raw notes didn't contain one ("someone needs to email," Q3 "revisit"). I can flag every gap and suggest a likely owner, but I can't invent who actually agreed to do what — that would risk assigning work to the wrong person. Same with the churn action item: I surfaced it because the logic demands it, but marked it as inferred so you can confirm.
The fix is upstream, not in the tool: if the transcript captures who spoke and who committed (even "Sarah: I'll pull churn numbers"), every UNASSIGNED tag above resolves to a real name automatically. Feed me speaker-attributed notes and this output goes from "here are your gaps" to "here's your fully-owned action list."
Fastest close for this specific meeting: reply with names for items 1 and 3, and I'll return a clean, fully-assigned version.